How to Play This Icebreaker Game
- 1Introduce 3–4 broad styles (e.g., explorer, planner, connector, analyst).
- 2Ask participants which they identify with and why.
- 3Discuss how styles complement each other at work.
Facilitator Guide
Opening Script:
I'll read 4 broad styles. Which one sounds most like you *on a good day*? Explorer, Planner, Connector, or Analyst? Pick one and share why.
Closing Script:
Capture norms for cross‑style collaboration. Turn top tips into a one‑pager for newcomers.
Why This Works
Why this icebreaker game works: A lightweight lens invites reflection without labels. It creates shared language for preferences and trade‑offs.
Best For
Ideal icebreaker situations for this game include:
- Team charters
- Kickoffs
- Retrospectives
Important Notes
- Avoid stereotyping; emphasize fluidity
- Invite multiple identities or ‘situational’ styles
- Keep it practical—end with concrete working agreements
Ideas & Prompts
Personality Types
The Explorer: Loves new ideas, starts fast, sees the big picture. Might miss details.
The Planner: Loves structure, details, and risk mitigation. Might move slowly.
The Connector: Loves people, harmony, and team vibe. Might avoid conflict.
The Analyst: Loves data, logic, and finding the 'truth'. Might over-analyze.
Game FAQ
What if I feel like I am two types?
Pick your dominant one for this specific context (e.g., this project), or explain how you bridge both.
What if I feel like I am two types?
Pick your dominant one for this specific context (e.g., this project), or explain how you bridge both.
Are these scientific?
No, they are simplified archetypes for conversation, not a clinical diagnosis.
Are these scientific?
No, they are simplified archetypes for conversation, not a clinical diagnosis.
